a sign on a pole
Photograph ©2025 by Brian Cohen.

Approval Terminated For Congestion Pricing Program in New York

Is this the end of the Central Business District Tolling Program in New York?

The approval terminated for the congestion pricing program in New York by the Department of Transportation of the United States has fueled more controversy into the Central Business District Tolling Program — and it could mean the end for tolling visitors simply to enter the lower half of Manhattan for a minimum of nine dollars per day.

Approval Terminated for Congestion Pricing Program in New York

a street light on a pole
Photograph ©2025 by Brian Cohen.

The Federal Highway Administration of the Department of Transportation of the United States terminated approval of the pilot for the Central Business District Tolling Program of New York earlier today, Wednesday, February 19, 2025 as the result of an order to halt the congestion pricing program that was issued from the current president of the United States.

“New York State’s congestion pricing plan is a slap in the face to working class Americans and small business owners,” Sean P. Duffy — who is the current secretary of transportation of the United States — said, according to to this official press release from the Department of Transportation. “Commuters using the highway system to enter New York City have already financed the construction and improvement of these highways through the payment of gas taxes and other taxes. But now the toll program leaves drivers without any free highway alternative, and instead, takes more money from working people to pay for a transit system and not highways. It’s backwards and unfair. The program also hurts small businesses in New York that rely on customers from New Jersey and Connecticut. Finally, it impedes the flow of commerce into New York by increasing costs for trucks, which in turn could make goods more expensive for consumer. Every American should be able to access New York City regardless of their economic means. It shouldn’t be reserved for an elite few.”

Sean Duffy sent this letter to Kathy Hochul — who is the current governor of the state of New York Governor — which outlined the reasons why the agreement that was signed under the Value Pricing Pilot Program on November 21, 2024 was officially rescinded and thus effectively ends tolling authority for the cordon pricing plan, which imposes tolls on drivers entering Manhattan south of East 60 Street and West 60 Street.

“It’s not the real world, Sean”, Hochul responded in a blistering official rebuttal. “It’s real life for New Yorkers. And don’t you forget that. We’re in fight mode within seconds of us getting this notification. Our MTA was prepared. We knew this could come and filed a lawsuit within minutes. I’m very confident we will be successful. And I also want to say, the cameras are staying on. We are keeping the cameras on. Lights, cameras, action. They’re staying on.”

The following was posted at the official X site of The White House:

“CONGESTION PRICING IS DEAD. Manhattan, and all of New York, is SAVED. LONG LIVE THE KING!” –President Donald J. Trump

“At 1:58 p.m., President Donald Trump tweeted, ‘Long live the king’”, Hochul responded in the aforementioned rebuttal. “I’m here to say, New York hasn’t labored under a king in over 250 years and we sure as hell are not going to start now.”

Other opponents to this action wasted no time in response — such as from the current comptroller of the City of New York:

In response to the Trump administration illegally reversing approval of congestion pricing, New York City Comptroller Brad Lander released the following statement: 

“Congestion pricing is working: traffic is down, travel times have plummeted 30%, transit ridership has surged, and hundreds of millions of dollars are flowing to improve our subways and buses. We must not let Trump drag us back to crappier subway service, standstill traffic, and smoggier air. 

“Having been at the forefront of the fight to implement congestion pricing, I am appalled that President Trump and his U.S. Department of Transportation put this in reverse, purely for political purposes. Let’s be clear: the U.S. DOT properly approved this program after extensive environmental review. 

“My Office will explore all available options to reverse yet another instance of illegal federal overreach by the Trump administration – and keep congestion pricing and New York City moving forward.”

A Brief History of the Congestion Pricing Program

a sign on a pole
Photograph ©2025 by Brian Cohen.

On Tuesday, August 16, 2022, this article here at The Gate With Brian Cohen first reported that a congestion pricing program may be coming to the city of New York — along with a plethora of information that led to that initial proposal.

The toll rates were then revealed after members of the board of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority overwhelmingly voted to approve congestion pricing in the city of New York on the morning of Wednesday, December 6, 2023 — and the cost would initially be a minimum of $15.00 per day for passenger vehicles before the program was paused indefinitely on Thursday, June 6, 2024.

Despite the “indefinite pause”, the New York Congestion Pricing Program became effective as of Sunday, January 5, 2025 at midnight pursuant upon approval by the board of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority at its meeting on Monday, November 18, 2024. The toll was reduced to nine dollars per day for the initial implementation of the program; and the following schedule of the cost for motorists to enter the lower half of Manhattan was announced with a daytime automobile E-ZPass toll of:

  • $9.00 from 2025 through 2027
  • $12.00 from 2028 through 2030

Final Boarding Call

a street sign and a building
Photograph ©2025 by Brian Cohen.

The reasons why New York wins with congestion pricing — regardless of the outcome — are quite simple, as I confirmed during my recent trip to the city last month…

…but that was before the termination of the program by the federal government of the United States.

I agree with most of what Sean Duffy said. New York should not get any federal aid if the city is able to successfully raise money on its own. Is there anyone in this universe who believes that the revenue which the city collects is used prudently, economically, efficiently, and without any corruption whatsoever?

If that person does exist, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell to him or her.

Even though I completely disagree with Kathy Hochul, I have to admire her response — if only because that response was the first time I heard her sound like a real New Yorker and have the balls to say what she said.

As for Donald Trump, he is not a king. He is a president. The difference between the two roles is substantial. I personally find what was posted at the official X site of The White House to be wholly unprofessional and unbecoming of a world leader. To have it look like a cheap mock-up of Time magazine only cheapens the presidency more. This could have been handled better in so many ways.

Plenty of ways exist in which everyone can win. First, the city of New York needs to clean up its public transportation systems — both in terms of filth and in terms of crime. Cleaner, safer, and more reliable subway lines are what attracts the most people to use public transportation…

…and once that is accomplished, raise the fares. The current fare is $2.90 per ride. Raise it to $3.25 per ride. Offer discounts to everyone who purchases fares in bulk, as getting the money in advance gives the city much-needed cash flow.

Allow motorists to pay tolls with credit cards in addition to electronic tolls — and charge the actual toll and not the inflated rate of tolls by mail. Then, use that toll money to improve bridges, tunnels, roads, highways, and traffic control devices. The motorist should not have to pay for public transportation so that someone can ride for a reduced rate — or even for free. Implement those improvements and perhaps congestion many be relieved without have to charge a fee just to enter the zone.

Better yet, why have the money which is currently being spent on all of this legal garbage on improving the transportation network in the greater metropolitan area of New York

The subway system in New York could be so much more efficient in its present form. That needs to be exploited to increase ridership; and many more ideas can be expounded upon and implemented that have not been mentioned in this article.

For my own selfish reasons — of which I am entitled — I hope that the Central Business District Tolling Program of New York dies a quick and permanent death. One of many reasons I feel this way is because if New York is permitted to implement a congestion pricing program, then other cities across the United States will likely adopt similar programs to raise funds off of you and me. The potential reach of this concept is far and wide.

I am more than happy to pay my fair share of prices and costs as long as I get value in return for my hard-earned funds — but governments and jurisdictions should not treat us like cash cows that believe we have free money to simply throw around…

Photograph ©2025 by Brian Cohen.

  1. I assume you don’t live in NYC but I do, and as a resident of the CBP (e.g., the zone being charged), its been an amazing change. Traffic is down significantly, and while there is a small increase for the residents ($0.75-$1.50 per Taxi/Uber), it actually makes the trip cost the same as you get to your destination so much faster and don’t pay for the extra meter time.

    Yes, you could raise the charges by increasing the subway, but really, if you’re raising tolls anyway. At least with congestion pricing, there’s a huge decrease in traffic.

    For the people who complain it because they drive in – why are they driving?? NYC is a mass transit city and there are plenty of park-n-ride options. Sure, its nice to drive into the busiest city in America, but you have to pay for that choice.

    As for your fear of other cities adopting the same, take a look at the UK who’s had the same program in place for years. Do you see any other city in the UK doing it? (Hint: the answer is no). Congestion pricing only works for a crowded city like NY or London. Suburbia can rest assured it won’t happen because it just isn’t needed.

    1. I do not live in New York now, A local in CBD; but I was born and raised there. I went to school and college there; and I also worked there for years.

      I did not see a substantial decrease in traffic when I was there last month; and not every area experienced a decrease in traffic from my personal perspective. Funnily enough, Lyft voluntarily refunded that $1.50 for each ride that I took into the lower half of Manhattan. Yes, I also used the subway.

      When I lived there, I mostly used the subway. People drive in because they are either visiting someplace for a short visit; or they are trying to get from Brooklyn and Queens to get to New Jersey or vice versa as only two of many viable reasons. Perhaps driving is faster and easier than taking three trains and a bus to go between two points. Although I am not one of those people, some of them believe that the subway is simply not safe to use. Lots of plausible reasons exist as to why people would prefer to drive in at times than take public transportation.

      I have to pay for the choice of driving in? You mean that existing tolls and parking fees and taxes are not enough?!?

      If you live in the central business district of Manhattan, you are doing that by choice. “Congestion” has been a part of Manhattan for greater than 100 years. The argument seems similar to someone who moves to live near an airport and then wants the government to reduce the noise of passing airplanes.

      Thank you for the “hint” that cities other than London in the United Kingdom did not implement congestion pricing — but what about Milan, Singapore, Stockholm, and other cities and regions around the world which currently have congestion pricing? You might not find it in Tarrytown or Hempstead; but what is to stop other cities which want more revenue from implementing it?

      While you certainly have cogent arguments in support of the Central Business District Tolling Program as a resident of the area, I stand by my opinion in that if the city of New York can raise funds through the congestion pricing program, they should not use federal funds — my tax dollars, for example — to assist the city…

      …especially if the program is as successful as you say it is…

    2. As a local I know that nearly everyone who drives is forced to. We’d love to have good public transport options but if you live in an outer borough things get difficult. You can take the subway if you are less concerned about the risk of getting pushed on the tracks or being assaulted but not everyone lives near the subway. That means a bus ride. The bus might take 20 minutes to get to the subway. Sometimes it is 2 buses. If you live on an express route, great. Unfortunately, the traffic means it can be a 2 hour ride from 34th street to the destination. Going down in the morning can take 70-75 minutes which still isn’t great. Metro North is cool if you live near a station. If you have to drive 15 minutes to a station or take the bus other than rail link, it defeats the purpose. I haven’t taken the LIRR or Path but I assume people there have the same issues with public transportation. No one wants to pay $25 a day for parking in a garage or pay to own, lease, fuel, and maintain a car to get into Manhattan but some people have no other choice.

      There are no good solutions but congestion pricing for outsiders is not it. What makes more sense is actually charging residents below 60th street for having cars. They don’t need them since Manhattan is very walkable, has a lot of bus routes, and has the subway. It’s the outer borough people who need them. Rather than congestion pricing, a limit on new housing and new office buildings other than to replace existing ones makes most sense. There are too many people and infrastructure can’t keep up. Keep NYC at no more than 8 million residents.

      1. You nailed one of my commutes when I lived in New York, David Arnett — and I completely agree with everything you wrote to the point that I could not have said it any better myself. Thank you.

        I lived in Brooklyn and went to a specialized high school in Manhattan. The bus ride did indeed take 20 minutes before I arrived at the first of two trains to take me to the East Side of Manhattan. Including walking to the bus stop and walking from the last subway station, the entire trip lasted for a duration of 1.5 hours each way — and that did not include any delays or other anomalies.

        I only needed to take one fewer train when I went to college. I had one class in the evening on Tuesdays one semester. Driving into Manhattan was much easier and safer for me than taking a bus and a train at off hours. I was fortunate in that I paid no tolls and no parking for that commute. The time savings and the convenience of driving versus public transportation was significant.

        Today, I would have to pay a minimum of nine dollars each time for that same scenario…

  2. Hmmm.. Brian’s response, before I had the opportunity to realize he’s not from “the city”, made me wonder if he primarily walked,or never utilize surface transportation before or after congestion pricing.

    1. I may not live in New York now, First last; but I was born and raised there.

      I actually did a lot of walking when I lived, went to school, and worked in New York.

      Just last month, I walked from the Theater District to Greenwich Village. When I started out, the temperature was a balmy seven degrees Fahrenheit…

  3. Brian-you are so-soand correct, I too lived in the city for 50 years and rode 2 buses and the subway to get to my school in the city,it took almost 2 hours one way. For the last few years going into the city I REFUSED TO TAKE A TRAIN because of the “filth & crime”, other cities DO NOT have these problems, and because of this I HAD to drive into the city (gas, additional insurance costs, toll, and parking cost a lot more than public transportation ) NYC is not the same as I knew it because of the poor management and that is why many have left the city

    Want to reduce the number of cars? raise the toll to $ 50.00 problem solved and the city will die

    Why do I HAVE to support a dirty, filthy unsafe subway? Because I DRIVE? let those who use it pay—–NOT ME

  4. Brian-you are so correct, I too lived in the city for 50 years and rode 2 buses and the subway to get to my school in the city, it took me almost 2 hours one way. For the last few years going into the city I REFUSED TO TAKE A TRAIN because of the “filth & crime”, other cities DO NOT have these problems, and because of this I HAD to drive into the city ( pay gas, additional insurance costs, tolls, and parking all this cost a lot more than public transportation )

    NYC is not the same as I knew it because of the poor management and that is why many have left the city, Want to reduce the number of cars? Raise the toll to $50.00 and the problem is solved and the city will die.
    Why do I HAVE to support a dirty, filthy, unsafe subway? Because I DRIVE? Let those who use it pay—–NOT ME

  5. Your ability to simplify complex topics is commendable. I always learn something new from your posts—thank you for sharing your expertise!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!