Iguazu Falls
Iguazu Falls in Argentina, as seen from Brazil. Photograph ©2005 by Brian Cohen.

Update: Brazil Reintroduces Visa Requirement January 10 2024

Again: is this necessary — or a step in the wrong direction?

In a reversal of a policy of allowing entry with no visa which was implemented on Monday, June 17, 2019, Brazil reintroduces visa requirement on Wednesday, January 10 2024 for citizens of the United States, Australia, and Canada “in compliance with the principle of reciprocity.”

Update: Brazil Reintroduces Visa Requirement January 10 2024

South American Coatis Iguaçu Falls Brazil
Coatimundis wait for food to be dropped by tourists in Brazil. Photograph ©2005 by Brian Cohen.

The original date for the reintroduction of the visa requirements was Sunday, October 1, 2023; and they also initially included Japan. The information was officially updated as early as Monday, August 28, 2023.

The following notice is at the official Internet web site of the Ministério das Relações Exteriores of the government of Brazil:

Visit visas for citizens of Australia, Canada and United States

The Brazilian Government will resume the requirement of visiting visas for citizens of Australia, Canada and the United States.

The decision was taken after consultations with these countries on the possibility of granting visa exemptions to Brazilian nationals, in compliance with the principle of reciprocity.

The measure will come into effect on January 10th 2024.

Citizens of the United States will once again be required to pay $160.00 for a visa for the privilege of entering Brazil; whereas citizens of most other countries will pay $80.00 — with the following exceptions:

  • Algeria — $85.00
  • Angola — $180.00
  • Australia — $120.00
  • China — $115.00

A Brief History of Visas Issued By Brazil

Iguazu Falls Brazil
Photograph ©2005 by Brian Cohen.

Due to the United States historically charging $160.00 for a visa to citizens of Brazil who want to visit, Brazil had reciprocated by charging the same amount for a visa for citizens of the United States who wanted to visit Brazil — thus the term reciprocity fee. However, the cost for a nonimmigrant visa to enter the United States has increased from $160.00 to $185.00 effective as of Saturday, June 17, 2023.

Dilma Rousseff — who was the president of Brazil until she was impeached and removed from office on Wednesday, August 31, 2016 — agreed to suspend the requirements for visas between Wednesday, June 1, 2016 and Sunday, September 18, 2016 in what was known as the “exceptional, unilateral visa waiver” for visitors from certain other countries and regions which purportedly have “a strong Olympic tradition, which have hosted the Games in the past and pose no migration risk or national security risks” for the 2016 Olympic Games in the city of Rio de Janeiro, which occurred from Friday, August 5, 2016 through Sunday, August 21, 2016; and for the Paralympic Games, which occurred between Wednesday, September 7, 2016 and Sunday, September 18, 2016.

Effective as of Thursday, January 25, 2018, the fee which citizens of the United States were required to pay in order to visit Brazil had been significantly reduced to $44.24; and the service fee of $4.24 — which was included in the reduced visa fee — was for the convenience of processing the visa application electronically in three simple steps, which substantially reduced the amount of time needed to apply and receive the visa. Electronic visas were implemented by Brazil at that time, which meant that visitors from the United States, Canada and Japan can apply for electronic visas from the comfort of their own homes and no longer needed to travel to the Brazilian consulate nearest to them and wait in long lines.

The government of Brazil permitted citizens of the United States, Canada, Australia and Japan to enter the country without applying for or paying for a visa in order to increase the number of visitors between destinations by as much as 25 percent effective as of Monday, June 17, 2019.

Final Boarding Call

passport stamps
Photograph ©2016 by Brian Cohen.

Although I can understand why a country would want to impose restrictive visas on visitors for various reasons — keeping track of them while they are in that country; as well as to have a revenue stream — they do stand the chance of losing out on the economic benefits of the dollars of tourists and business people when the process of securing that visa is unnecessarily complicated and prohibitively expensive. Saudi Arabia, North Korea and Russia are three countries which immediately come to my mind when it comes to the hassle of getting a visa — although Saudi Arabia has been working on becoming friendlier to foreign visitors — but Brazil has been known to not exactly have the easiest or least-expensive process either.

For me, countries which have such restrictive visa policies indicate to me that they are not friendly countries; or perhaps they just do not want for you or me to visit for whatever reasons — and yes, I do understand that there are people who view the United States in that manner as well. In today’s “shrinking” world primarily due to technology, that is a potentially costly mistake, in my opinion. Restrictive visa policies may scratch the “tip of the iceberg” pertaining to greater issues within certain countries; but they do not help in promoting being part of what should be a peaceful global community.

By reducing — or, better yet, eliminating — the fees to secure a visa for a visitor, I believe that the economic benefits would more than make up for it. That $160.00 per person for a visa to visit Brazil could instead go towards patronizing businesses and other areas of the general economy, which in turn would increase tax revenues for the government as one of many benefits. I am by no means an expert on economic policies in global economies; but I believe that charging exorbitant visa fees actually does more harm to countries economically in the long term than helps them.

At the very least, countries should do whatever is possible to strike a realistic balance in ensuring their security and charging fees to visitors: attempt to have the visa process as easy as possible for visitors to enter countries without compromising on smart security; and lower the visa fees as much as possible — or even consider eliminating them. Entering Bahrain and Mozambique are two examples of costly visas and unnecessary harassment which soured my experiences in those two countries enough to the point of where I would be just fine if I never visited them again.

Idealistically, I would really like to see the day where you and I can travel anywhere in the world with few to no impediments; but with human nature being the way it is, I know that will not happen anytime soon — if at all…

For a limited time, you were able visit places in Brazil — such as Iguaçu Falls — without having to pay for any fees associated with obtaining a visa. That changes on January 10, 2024. All photographs ©2005 and ©2016 by Brian Cohen.

  1. America does not have totally clean hands. America’s immigration policy is full of red tape. There are debates among Democrats and Republicans about who is strong or weak on border issues but, in my opinion, the amount of red tape is a major issue. Make decisions quick and objective and stop making each case like major litigation. Do we have litigation every time we need to take a college class or buy gas? No.

    As far as the US requiring visa, it’s easy to be a visa waiver program country. Just don’t have a lot of illegal aliens coming to the US. The UK doesn’t have a lot of illegal aliens coming. Neither does Japan or Taiwan (Republic of China). All 3 are visa waiver program participants. Brazil is poorer and, no surprise, does have illegal aliens coming to the US. That’s why Brazilian tourists need a visa.

    Does it discourage Brazilian tourism to the US? Yes. A Brazilian visa requirement for Americans will discourage American tourism to Brazil. Last minute award travel is ruled out. All Brazil needs to do is raise its living standards and illegal aliens will stop going from Brazil to the US.

    1. US border has more wholes than Swiss cheese and their deportation principles sucks.
      Lack of punishment for hiring illegals is also one of the key issues.
      Receiving what deserving.

    2. I absolutely agree that the United States has culpability in the visa reciprocity process, derek.

      What I said about Brazil applies to the United States as well, as tourism is a major industry that could potentially be more lucrative if the visa policies were eased to foreign visitors…

  2. Unfortunately Brazil went too soft with USA. They should grant the period to maximum one year for 160 USD, as USA does and application is only through consulates in USA with personal visiting. Some cities in Brazil have more than year queque for visa application interview.

  3. Saudi Arabia is quite easy to visit as a tourist, for citizens of a number of countries. Folks from the U.S. (among many others) can apply online, or at a Saudi airport. Saudia (the airline) also has a visa-free visit scheme, but its rollout has been clunky.

    As for Russia, pay a few hundred bucks, the visa is yours. Just don’t expect to use Western credit cards there (since last year).

    North Korea, that’s an easy one … rather, it WAS when the U.S. let us go. Participate in a mandatory group tour, through which the visa is included.

    YT@findingfoodfluency

  4. Congrats to Brazil for reciprocating immigration policies. The writer is so hypocrite, he talks about Brazil but the same (or worse) could be applied to the USA. Also it is so entitled to say that we would benefit from your dollars as if having you in our countries would be such a joy…A lot of Latin American countries are playgrounds for the uneducated and rude Americans and it does not mean that tourism are taking them to the stars, in fact a lot of “Americans” are actually imigrating to have social care in other countries. The writer is just a one more entitled white American

    1. “I do understand that there are people who view the United States in that manner as well.”

      That is in the article, R; and I have opined more than once that the United States is included in my criticism of charging visitors fees for visas which can be difficult to obtain. Had you read other articles which I had written on this topic, you would have known that.

      I stand by what I wrote, of which your erroneous and accusatory interpretation is wholly incorrect on so many different levels.

    2. Actually this comment stinks of ignorance. It’s not some game, Brazil will lose money from this just like the US loses money from potentially lost tourism the other way around. I’m heading to Argentina with the family early next year and stopping at Iguazu Falls. I was planning a trip into Brazil while I was there but instead I’ll opt to spend that money in Argentina/Paraguay instead. We’re Canadian so this also applies, but spending hundreds of dollars and going through visa processing hassle just for a quick trip into Brazil isn’t worth our time so we won’t spend a cent there nor will it be a priority for future travel. I’m annoyed at the Canadian government for their arrogant take on this as well, as there are plenty of countries open to us that we haven’t reciprocated. But this is a lose-lose scenario, where it could have been a lose-win scenario with Brazil coming out as the winner. Instead they decided to lose. Enjoy joining the losing team!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!