Photograph ©2015 by Brian Cohen.

Peanut Allergy of Son Results in Family Leaving the Airplane Prior to Flight

K yson and Sara Dana claimed that they were forced to leave the airplane operated by Allegiant Air on the afternoon of Monday, May 2, 2016 prior to a flight out of Provo because the mother alerted a member of the flight crew upon boarding the aircraft that their son Theo — who is two years old — is allergic to peanuts.

Peanut Allergy of Son Results in Family Leaving the Airplane Prior to Flight

The family was on their way home to Oakland when the flight attendant supposedly immediately told the couple that she did not recommend that they fly as passengers aboard the airplane.

Equipped with an epinephrine pen — also known as an epi pen, which is used to help those people who suffer from severe allergies — and sanitation wipes to sanitize their seats against trace amounts of nuts and legumes before settling in for the flight to Oakland. A different member of the flight crew reportedly requested to passengers seated within the vicinity of the family to avoid eating peanuts; and everyone who was asked consented to the request with no resistance or argument.

Shortly after the situation seemed to be resolved, a third member of the flight crew approached the family — claiming to have communicated with the pilot and consulted with a medical professional from a third party organization, resulting in the decision to have the family removed from the airplane because it would not be safe to allow them to fly as passengers for the flight; and the family ultimately missed its flight home.

According to this article written by Lauren Steinbrecher for KSTU-TV FOX 13 News in Salt Lake City, “Theo had just gone into anaphylactic shock over the weekend before their flight after accidentally ingesting an almond.”

Response From Allegiant Air — and The Debate Ensues

Part of the official response sent to the family from Allegiant Air included the following statement:

“On behalf of the entire Allegiant team, please allow me to offer my sincere apology for the inconveniences this incident has caused for you and your family. We regret that you were denied boarding due to any misunderstanding regarding the severity of your child’s peanut allergy. I realize that medical issues can be highly challenging. We just wanted to make sure you arrived home safely.”

This article — which I wrote back on Thursday, August 21, 2014 — covered nut allergies from both sides of the issue that have been in the news; and this latest report pertaining to the experience of the Dana family only adds to the growing number of stories and opinions.

The debate rages on as to whether or not airlines and their passengers should go out of their way to accommodate those who are unfortunate enough to suffer from such allergies — or whether or not people who are severely affected should avoid traveling altogether and simply stay home; and even with the apology, the Dana family would like to see changes in policy pertaining to how those with allergies are treated aboard airplanes on flights…

…but what is the answer? Set up buffer zones aboard airplanes for passengers with severe allergies? Permanently ban the serving of food items which aggravate allergies such as peanuts? Not allow people with severe food allergies to board an airplane for a flight? Operate special flights to cater to people with severe allergies?

Here is a comprehensive list of the peanut allergy policies of 18 different airlines — all of which are based in the United States and Canada that offer commercial passenger service — as a supplemental follow-up to this article pertaining to the continuous debate of whether or not the allergies of passengers should determine what food is served or permitted aboard an airplane.


A generous worker at Provo Municipal Airport secured them a new flight at no cost with a different airline to them and personally drove them to the Salt Lake City International Airport to safely fly home, according to the aforementioned article from KSTU-TV FOX 13 News in Salt Lake City.

Meanwhile, space is limited and at a premium aboard what some people call a long metal tube which hurls through the sky. For someone with a severe allergy to a food product such as peanuts, avoiding consumption is not necessarily enough.

According to the Mayo Clinic, an allergic reaction may occur if you inhale dust or aerosols containing peanuts, such as that of peanut flour. Symptoms of the allergic reaction may include discomfort, such as swelling of the skin, runny nose, itching, shortness of breath or a tightening of the throat — or anaphylaxis could be a symptom which can cause a reaction that can threaten your life if your allergy to peanuts is severe enough.

The good news is that a patch for people who suffer from allergies associated with peanuts has reportedly been effective in extensive tests recently conducted throughout North America and Europe, which could potentially resolve the peanut allergy issue aboard airplanes in the future.

Severe allergies from which people suffer in general should not be taken lightly. In fact, severe reactions to peanut allergies can be fatal — and I do not blame flight attendants for not wanting to take a chance at serving peanuts aboard a flight if there is a chance of the potential death of at least one passenger known to suffer from severe reactions to peanuts as a result…

…but the real question is whose rights have a priority: the allergy sufferer; or those who are seated nearby the allergy sufferer? Is there a reasonable compromise which can be reached once and for all?

Photograph ©2015 by Brian Cohen.


  1. I think the part about them getting rebooked, etc on another flight could have been near the top of the article the same way that the more disparaging parts about Allegiant’s handling of this case was.

    1. I was careful not to disparage the actions of the handling of the matter by members of the flight crew of Allegiant Air in the article, Carl, as I believe they did what they thought was best in terms of protecting the boy and not taking chances.

      Might they have gone overboard? Perhaps — but I do not believe that their actions were intentionally disparaging.

  2. It has been reported that this family was re-accommodated on another airline since Allegiant couldn’t find available space for 5 days. What hasn’t been widely reported is that they were re-accommodated on American… whose policies are even less accommodating of peanut allergies. Did they ask for and/ or receive the special treatment they requested on Allegiant when flying American? Or did they decide that maybe the imposition on other passengers wasn’t so important after all?

    1. That child’s right to life is more important than the passengers’ right to eat peanuts when they please.

      Oh wait – there is no damn right for people to eat peanuts whenever they damn well please. It’s not a thing!

      It’s a few hours of a nut free life to spare someone’s life and serious discomfort and illness. Why are people so resistant to being just a little more considerate? What selfish bullshit values have these people been raised with to be so selfish ?

      1. Thank you
        I mean really if there’s laws on smoking and where to smoke legalized cannibis
        Then there should be laws on where peanuts/tree nuts can be eaten

    2. I had read differing accounts of the actual outcome, Segments; and I was unable to find definitive proof of what actually happened when I wrote and posted this article.

  3. I was on a flight a few years ago, Delta? where it was announced that they would not be serving peanuts this flight due to a passengers peanut allergy and asked that we also refrain from eating any that we brought on board ourselves. I never really gave it a second thought other than it was a nice way to show compassion for someone else. Was I inconvenienced? no, were other passengers? possibly.
    It seems that food allergies are becoming more prevalent with each passing day. Is an allergy zone on each plane practical? doubtful but the first carrier that comes market with a suitable solutions might have have an advantage.

    1. “It seems that food allergies are becoming more prevalent with each passing day.” It does, doesn’t it, Back Again And Gone?

      Not that it was not a problem years ago; but what happened decades ago when passengers with severe allergies boarded an airplane?

      I personally have no problems with refraining from ingesting something which could be potentially dangerous to a fellow passenger. It is not like I can never eat a particular food again for the rest of my life. I am willing to sacrifice for several hours if necessary.

  4. My wife has had severe nut allergies her whole life — always carries an epipen, one bite of food with nuts will result in immediate throat closing, several trips to ERs over the last decade — but she can’t stand the families that wipe everything down and establishing a 10-foot bubble around their children.

    Anyone insisting “my child is so allergic, just the smell sends him into anaphylaxis” does not understand physiology. The reaction is to the protein: unless the seat has a sizeable fragment, and the kid licks the seat, no issue. Inhaling an airborne protein is possible but highly unlikely. Although my wife truly hates the smell of peanut butter and wouldn’t mind a bubble of non-consumption, she can’t imagine insisting on it.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!